Early christianity, Early Islam, Historical Mention of Muhammad, judaism, lost scripture, Muhammad, The Scriptures, trinity, Uncategorized

Historical Jesus : Myth or History

19E01AA800000578-3018471-image-a-40_1427994447712.jpg

Jesus : Myth or History

Sources for the Historical Jesus comes from Following :

 

  1. Gospels and Letters of Paul
  2. Non – Christian Sources like Roman Sources and Jewish Sources

 

Historical Sources for Jesus is Very Week  as No Contemperory Sources Exist at least For his name check. Unfortunately, there is no single name check for Jesus of Nazareth from 1st Century A.D.

p66-john-1-4.jpg

Gospels : in case of Gospels , Scholars in west have general consensus canonical four gospels were written at least 70 years after Jesus’s Death (if he existed ) .

180px-P52_recto.jpg

p52 – 2nd Century Manuscript of Gospel of John (Only Earliest Manuscript)

Second Problem : Though Gospels are ”Considered” written after 70 A.D , No manuscript of any Gospels come and even traced from 1st Century A.D. Each and Every Manuscript of Gospels and Letter’s of PAUL are from 2nd Century A.D. That nothing comes near the even 100 years of Jesus Period, All are late Comers and Doubtful because of their LATE Production .

420px-WorksJosephus1640TP.jpg

Josephus’s Work 17th Century Manuscript.

Third Problem : Non Christian Sources all also late except Josephus’s Little Name check and Short Detail, But, Scholar threw the Quotation as Christian Interpolation from Medieval Period. The Reason is Mainly that we donthave any Hebrew Manuscripts of Josephus’s Work and All Available Manuscripts are From Middle Ages .

Tacitus can be trusted but his Name Check on jesus and Hint seems Hear say  or witness to  proto-”Christians”. Still, Tacitus Published his Annals and Histories in 2nd Century A.D.

Fourth Problem : There is no Inscription or Document from 1st Century A.D. Not even a Single Coin or Rock Inscription mention Jesus For over 100 years !!!!!! .

Why there was no Material Evidence  !!!! Was Jesus A Product of 2nd Century …. that is 150 Years After supposed Jesus !!!!

a-church-scrolls-e1437348506668.jpg

None of the New Testament Manuscript Come before 150 A.D, There is no Literary Evidence.

Paul : The So-Called Early Witness to Jesus, It is Worse For Paul than JESUS. there is no Historical evidence for PAUL for Over 150 years A.D. NO Coins !!!! No Official Record !!!! At all.

So, We have no Evidence of ”Any” Before 150 A.D !!!

Forget About James Tabor (archaeologist Who apparently Discovered Jesus’s Tomb) its well know forgery .

if we compare the Evidence we have for Muhammad’s Historical Attestation, its like Sun(M) and Sand Grain (J)

Main sources for the Historical Muhammed comes from following         Sources :

  1. Qur’an – We have Manuscript  from Muhammad’s Time
  2. Hadith –
  3. Seerah Literature
  4. Non – Muslim Sources -We have Manuscript  from Muhammad’s Time
  5. Material Evidence From His period (7th Century A.D )  – We have Coins, Inscriptions, Attestations, Documents, Books, Sermons, Architectures ..etc Which Attest Muhammad from his PERIOD .

 

 

 

 

 

Standard